Froch V Groves on TV

First topic message reminder :

Hi guys,

Do any of you know if Froch v Groves will be on Sky, Boxnation or PPV?

Thanks in Advanced

Andy

Nothing wrong with having a threesome. People are just jealous.

TopHat24/7 wrote:

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

Strongback wrote:Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.

Its on Worldstarhiphop. I seen the vid posted but didn't watch it as its bad enough seeing him with clothes on rather than off.

The funny thing is apparantly he has to pay for sex off this women because he is dog ugly

Hahaha, you see the 'weekend pu$$y' presser with Paulie?? Amazing stuff, cracked up

Yea, he thought he had Paulie with his "Paulette" t-shirts and Paulie (quiet rightfully) says that the name "Adrien" itself is more of a girls name haha.

The build up to that fight was brilliant.

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Nothing wrong with having a threesome. People are just jealous.

I have threesomes all the time. My left and right hands are always up for it

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

TopHat24/7 wrote:

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

Strongback wrote:Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.

Its on Worldstarhiphop. I seen the vid posted but didn't watch it as its bad enough seeing him with clothes on rather than off.

The funny thing is apparantly he has to pay for sex off this women because he is dog ugly

Hahaha, you see the 'weekend pu$$y' presser with Paulie?? Amazing stuff, cracked up

Yea, he thought he had Paulie with his "Paulette" t-shirts and Paulie (quiet rightfully) says that the name "Adrien" itself is more of a girls name haha.

The build up to that fight was brilliant.

Yeh, the build up showed how truly lacking in actual character and charisma Broner was/is. All his 'comb my hair' antics fooled people into thinking he had some chat but soon as he came up against the master he got totally destroyed. Same way as he majors his boxing ability but once he comes up against the master of that (PBF) he'll also get destroyed.

No idea where the next Mayweather is going to come from, Lomachenko??

TopHat24/7 wrote:

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

TopHat24/7 wrote:

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

Strongback wrote:Talking of Peter North apparently Broner has made a tape of himself having a threesome which is going viral at the moment.

Its on Worldstarhiphop. I seen the vid posted but didn't watch it as its bad enough seeing him with clothes on rather than off.

The funny thing is apparantly he has to pay for sex off this women because he is dog ugly

Hahaha, you see the 'weekend pu$$y' presser with Paulie?? Amazing stuff, cracked up

Yea, he thought he had Paulie with his "Paulette" t-shirts and Paulie (quiet rightfully) says that the name "Adrien" itself is more of a girls name haha.

The build up to that fight was brilliant.

Yeh, the build up showed how truly lacking in actual character and charisma Broner was/is.  All his 'comb my hair' antics fooled people into thinking he had some chat but soon as he came up against the master he got totally destroyed.  Same way as he majors his boxing ability but once he comes up against the master of that (PBF) he'll also get destroyed.

No idea where the next Mayweather is going to come from, Lomachenko??

The most cringeworthy part of it all was Broner's "entourage". I have never heard so many fake "Yeah's" and fake laughs in all my life.

I hate the whole Mayweather comparison because even at the age Broner is at, Mayweather was NEVER that unlikable. He was cheeky but the length Broner is currently going to trying to be a rap star, making these sex tapes, plus the last video I seen of him he had a massive gut......so in all, these things give me a glimer of hope that his eye is off the ball and he gets a sever knockout that makes him disappear from boxing forever.

I can't stand Broner and I pray to the god's that he is knocked out by Maidana. He has no intelligence whatsoever, is incredibly disrespectful to opponents and just fake beyond belief with this About Billions nonsense. Mayweather can be bad, but the man is smart and articulate and would never be seen posting pictures of himself getting BJ's and stuff like that. I truly hope Maidana sparks Broner out.

I'm sure some of you find this talk of Broner's boner fascinating but I'd like to ask some questions to those posters who say Groves isn't PPV worthy.

If Groves isn't PPV worthy but Froch is (apparently), does it really matter who Froch fights? In much the same way, if Mayweather is PPV but Gavin Rees isn't, would you still pay to watch Floyd vs Rees?

Answer is no.............Hearn has it in his head Froch is huge..........and he'll remain PPV

In which case why are they moaning about Groves, these people aren't paying to watch him they're paying to watch Carl.

People!!!!

I'll pay the money for this one........As I'm interested in how Groves steps up......

Didn't pay for Kessler though who I didn't rate........and won't pay for anybody this guy fights bar a Ward 2 or a Stephenson/Bellew at 175.........whoever wins.

Mayweather chooses his opponents wisely though. The numbers for his fight against Guerrero showed people weren't duped into believing it was a credible PPV match up, hence the Alvarez fight following.

Mayweather on his own doesn't make his PPV's a success. His opponent has a big say in it too. Mayweather picks them out upon them riding a wave of success...ie: Ortiz winning his first belt against Berto, Guerrero beating Alcin and Berto moving up from Lightweight, Alvarez beating Trout etc etc etc. So for a PPV to be worthy of the fans money, it should be 2 guys at the top of their game who deserve it. Froch you can (sort of) make an arguement for. But Groves!!?? The highest belt hes ever sniffed is the commonwealth. The best opponent he's faced......Glen Johnson.

Fact is a Mayweather fight is an event..........Hearn seems to think froch has reached that status over here.........In fairness he is number 1 Brit by a mile.........

Whilst you are right... opponents help the numbers...........F and M are the draws..

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Fact is a Mayweather fight is an event..........Hearn seems to think froch has reached that status over here.........In fairness he is number 1 Brit by a mile.........

Whilst you are right... opponents help the numbers...........F and M are the draws..

Mayweather only gets PPV buys because he lets that pug faced tw@t Beiber carry his belts to the ring ;-)

Out of pure interest I wonder how many teen girls pay for Mayweather fights to see Bieber... Given how quick his tours, merchandise sell Probably thousands.

Shouldn't think teen girls pay for anything...........My Son Robby is an adult now and I'm still paying for him....Not that I resent it.......bless him..

You see that's where Hearn is going wrong..............Have Kelly Brook carry Brian rose's inter continental or whatever to the ring and he can go PPv........

How old is Robby?

Think they say it's usually about 25 before parents are fully off the hook on average....

My dad is 52 and he still lives with his parents. Called him out on it today and he said Frak off ...go to your room

I'm 19 and I've been on my own for eight months now. No kids either, if I did drugs or drank more often, Id be living the life! Don't really miss home unless my laundry needs washing....

What Hearn really needs to do is promote Wand direction as title bearers. Instant PPV numbers, there

Teenager living on your own for 8 months. Kingy, you must be knee deep in beer cans, pizza boxes and crusty tissues.

Not exactly Milky - I rarely drink (haven't had one since the Mayweather weekend)
Prefer Nandos to pizza, and while I'm not generally a neat freak, my bathroom could blind you that's how clean it is!

Only contraceptives are found lying around in my apartment - Leads me on a desperate cleaning mission everytime my mom comes over!!

Its on Sky Box Office, which means £15...

They haven't even paired it with Pacquiao vs Rios, since Boxnation picked that up.

Stupid mistake if you ask me.

No way is Froch vs Groves worth £15.

kingraf wrote:Not exactly Milky - I rarely drink  (haven't had one since the Mayweather weekend)
Prefer Nandos to pizza, and while I'm not generally a neat freak, my bathroom could blind you that's how clean it is!

Only contraceptives are found lying around in my apartment - Leads me on a desperate cleaning mission everytime my mom comes over!!

You'll have to get your boyfriends to clean up after themselves in future  

Moved out at 18. Put myself through university, it was cheaper to do it back then. My old man wasn't short of a few bob, he was just teaching me a life lesson.

Hearn must be praying the fight isn't a blow out win for Froch. If it is he'll be taking a lot of abuse given his previous talk about PPV only being for very special fights.

Disappointed they have not picked up the Manny fight to prop this up. Sky used to do this, remember they propped one of the Khan fights up with Manny vs Oscar. However if you do want to look for the plus side when the main event is not that great they tend to try and get a decent undercard on. I know Quigg is on for this one, which is a start.

Strongback wrote:Moved out at 18. Put myself through university, it was cheaper to do it back then.  My old man wasn't short of a few bob, he was just teaching me a life lesson.

Hearn must be praying the fight isn't a blow out win for Froch. If it is he'll be taking a lot of abuse given his previous talk about PPV only being for very special fights.

Nope, he'll spin it to his advantage...

"No-one's done to Groves what Carl just did to him. Groves is a world class fighter and been in with some of the best in the World and look at him now. That performance there shows why Carl is being avoided by the likes of Andre Ward etc etc etc etc"

or

"No-one's done to Carl what George just did to him. Carl is a world class fighter and been in with some of the best in the World and look at him now. That performance there shows why George is being avoided by the likes of Andre Ward etc etc etc etc"

Nothing wrong with some experimentation, milky!!! Just don't do it myself!

Threads like this show me one of the small mercies of livng in South Africa... Never paid a PPV in my life, yet I've seen all the big ones!

BoxingFan88 wrote:Its on Sky Box Office, which means £15...

They haven't even paired it with Pacquiao vs Rios, since Boxnation picked that up.

Stupid mistake if you ask me.

No way is Froch vs Groves worth £15.

Strange one that. Warren has a deal to show Goldenboy fights and Matchroom have been picking up international fights from Arum cards. For this reason I was expecting Matchroom to take the Pacquiao fight.

Warren must have dug deep into BoxNation's pockets to get this fight.

Because of the time differences the fight is apparently happening at 9.00am Chinese time.

Strongback wrote:

BoxingFan88 wrote:Its on Sky Box Office, which means £15...

They haven't even paired it with Pacquiao vs Rios, since Boxnation picked that up.

Stupid mistake if you ask me.

No way is Froch vs Groves worth £15.

Strange one that.  Warren has a deal to show Goldenboy fights and Matchroom have been picking up international fights from Arum cards.  For this reason I was expecting Matchroom to take the Pacquiao fight.

Warren must have dug deep into BoxNation's pockets to get this fight.  

Because of the time differences the fight is apparently happening at 9.00am Chinese time.

So it will still be a 5.30am job for us??

(tut)

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

Strongback wrote:

BoxingFan88 wrote:Its on Sky Box Office, which means £15...

They haven't even paired it with Pacquiao vs Rios, since Boxnation picked that up.

Stupid mistake if you ask me.

No way is Froch vs Groves worth £15.

Strange one that.  Warren has a deal to show Goldenboy fights and Matchroom have been picking up international fights from Arum cards.  For this reason I was expecting Matchroom to take the Pacquiao fight.

Warren must have dug deep into BoxNation's pockets to get this fight.  

Because of the time differences the fight is apparently happening at 9.00am Chinese time.

So it will still be a 5.30am job for us??

(tut)

Where is the link it is 9am in china?

Champagne_Socialist wrote:

Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn wrote:

Strongback wrote:

BoxingFan88 wrote:Its on Sky Box Office, which means £15...

They haven't even paired it with Pacquiao vs Rios, since Boxnation picked that up.

Stupid mistake if you ask me.

No way is Froch vs Groves worth £15.

Strange one that.  Warren has a deal to show Goldenboy fights and Matchroom have been picking up international fights from Arum cards.  For this reason I was expecting Matchroom to take the Pacquiao fight.

Warren must have dug deep into BoxNation's pockets to get this fight.  

Because of the time differences the fight is apparently happening at 9.00am Chinese time.

So it will still be a 5.30am job for us??

(tut)

Where is the link it is 9am in china?

I heard it was 9am as well, they are +8 hours on us, so its going to be in the night again =/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/boxing/manny-pacquiao/10206112/Manny-Pacquiao-to-fight-Brandon-Rios-in-Macau-at-10am-to-cash-in-on-US-pay-per-view-market.html