Who gets on your wick....

by Scott is Back Fri 12 Feb - 8:30

First topic message reminder :

After seeing Kanye spouting all his rubbish on twitter, his new Homeless Look clothing range....and his video game of his mom trying to get into Heaven, could this man actually be any more of a b3ll3nd!

Tell me people.....who gets right on your t!ts!

by TRUSSMAN66 Thu 9 Feb - 18:28

navyblueshorts wrote:
SecretFly wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:
(and, no, there's nothing wrong with my head)

Oh I know, navy. It's just that all die-hard anti-Brexitrump people happen to be Star Trek fans. Now there's a surprise given the ropy 'Let's all make inter-dimensional and species love' philosophies spun on that show.

Meanwhile back in the Real World... or Trump Tower if you're allergic to it... are you absolutely certain you're not going to be blaming Trump for any infernal economic muck-ups he might get himself involved in over the next 20 or so years as American President? I need to mark your card now, before he gets into office.
It depends SF. If he has both Houses behind him for 4/8 years and it's bad at the end? You bet your ass I will. If it's good, I'll probably say it was Obama laying the ground so that plank can take all the credit; you know how this works .

Obama inherited a mess from Bush.......

Clinton inherited 7.3% unemployment and dropped it to 4%.....(22 million jobs created)

Bush took it back to 7.7%..

Clinton added $1.3 trillion to the debt while Bush added $6 trillion.............

For sure Obama added $7 trillion but he inherited a huge welfare bill and a recession....and in fairness his bailouts worked.

Obama was a decent President...........I'm disappointed with him because I feel he could have done so much more.....

by **JuliusHMarx** Thu 9 Feb - 19:37

Ruby Wax anyone?

by **navyblueshorts** Fri 10 Feb - 9:00

SecretFly wrote:btw......... it's not 'close' to anything.

Ignore it by all means. Maybe you got a good deal on a nice new fad- diet that's too fabulously fashionable to ever dream of injecting real science into. Go for it, gurl!

Yup. I'll ignore it and you're right, it isn't very close to anything scientific. I'll take my Biochemistry career over your...what, exactly?

by TopHat24/7 Fri 10 Feb - 11:53

LOL it's always fun watching some numpty get torn apart on here when someone with actual real serious and extensive professional and academic experience to the subject matter bowls in....... Who gets on your wick.... - Page 9 1347041234

Who gets on your wick.... - Page 9 1347041234

by SecretFly Fri 10 Feb - 12:08

navyblueshorts wrote:
SecretFly wrote:btw......... it's not 'close' to anything.

Ignore it by all means. Maybe you got a good deal on a nice new fad- diet that's too fabulously fashionable to ever dream of injecting real science into. Go for it, gurl!
Yup. I'll ignore it and you're right, it isn't very close to anything scientific. I'll take my Biochemistry career over your...what, exactly?

If you're a biochemist and you can't follow the many many scientific papers that back up my overview synopsis, then I suggest you become a chef, navy.

by SecretFly Fri 10 Feb - 12:13

TopHat24/7 wrote:LOL it's always fun watching some numpty get torn apart on here when someone with actual real serious and extensive professional and academic experience to the subject matter bowls in.......

You've been in quite a long term foul mood Top (for some reason that your serious professionals with extensive academic experience on the subject matter can't quite put a handle on). So I'm glad a smile is finally reappearing on your face. There's hope yet that the programmed sleepers are maybe waking up.

by TopHat24/7 Fri 10 Feb - 12:23

'overview synopsis' laughing

by **Galted** Fri 10 Feb - 12:24

I've done a manual handling course.

by SecretFly Fri 10 Feb - 12:29

TopHat24/7 wrote:'overview synopsis'

I'm right - navy is wrong. Wink

Is that a synopsis you can actually understand now?

by **navyblueshorts** Fri 10 Feb - 12:55

SecretFly wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:
SecretFly wrote:btw......... it's not 'close' to anything.

Ignore it by all means. Maybe you got a good deal on a nice new fad- diet that's too fabulously fashionable to ever dream of injecting real science into. Go for it, gurl!
Yup. I'll ignore it and you're right, it isn't very close to anything scientific. I'll take my Biochemistry career over your...what, exactly?

If you're a biochemist and you can't follow the many many scientific papers that back up my overview synopsis, then I suggest you become a chef, navy.

Whatever mate. I read scientific papers on most days as part of my job. They're usually on Biochemistry or related areas and I work reasonably closely with human nutritional biochemists and physiologists. Again, you're what, exactly?

If you want to continue this, as we're off topic here, why don't you start a thread on it?

by **navyblueshorts** Fri 10 Feb - 12:55

SecretFly wrote:
TopHat24/7 wrote:'overview synopsis'

I'm right - navy is wrong. Is that a synopsis you can actually understand now?

He's a bit like his icon, Trump, Toppy. You know how it is...he just 'knows'.

by SecretFly Fri 10 Feb - 12:59

God, I feel the LOVE increasing! Wink

I'm blushing.

by **navyblueshorts** Fri 10 Feb - 13:06

by **navyblueshorts** Wed 13 Sep - 9:34

This dickwad:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41251652

and definitely all those who think he's worth more than a nanosecond on YouTube and allow him to make £millions off the back of it. What a World!

by Scottrf Wed 13 Sep - 9:38

navyblueshorts wrote:This dickwad:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41251652

and definitely all those who think he's worth more than a nanosecond on YouTube and allow him to make £millions off the back of it. What a World!

Jealous much.

by **navyblueshorts** Wed 13 Sep - 13:09

Scottrf wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:This dickwad:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41251652

and definitely all those who think he's worth more than a nanosecond on YouTube and allow him to make £millions off the back of it. What a World!
Jealous much.

No, he's a pillock. I'm slightly unsure whom I dislike the most - him, or those YouTube airheads who 'follow' him. I suppose I should give him credit for making a mint by being a pillock, but I can't bring myself to do that I'm afraid.

by Scottrf Wed 13 Sep - 13:24

navyblueshorts wrote:
Scottrf wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:This dickwad:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41251652

and definitely all those who think he's worth more than a nanosecond on YouTube and allow him to make £millions off the back of it. What a World!
Jealous much.
No, he's a pillock. I'm slightly unsure whom I dislike the most - him, or those YouTube airheads who 'follow' him. I suppose I should give him credit for making a mint by being a pillock, but I can't bring myself to do that I'm afraid.

You wouldn't make gaming videos for millions of pounds? Allow me to call BS.

by **navyblueshorts** Thu 14 Sep - 9:11

Scottrf wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:
Scottrf wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:This dickwad:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-41251652

and definitely all those who think he's worth more than a nanosecond on YouTube and allow him to make £millions off the back of it. What a World!
Jealous much.
No, he's a pillock. I'm slightly unsure whom I dislike the most - him, or those YouTube airheads who 'follow' him. I suppose I should give him credit for making a mint by being a pillock, but I can't bring myself to do that I'm afraid.
You wouldn't make gaming videos for millions of pounds? Allow me to call BS.

What's that got to do with whether he and his YouTube followers are pillocks, IMO?

Other things that get on my wick? People querying whether something I've declared as annoying me, in a thread just for that, really is annoying me

.

by LionsV2 Thu 14 Sep - 9:14

People who get offended by something inconsequential.

by **Hero** Thu 14 Sep - 9:44

Flat Earthers.

It's 2017.

by Beer Thu 14 Sep - 10:14

Hero wrote:Flat Earthers.

It's 2017.

What about people who think Jet Fuel can melt steel beams????

by **rIck_dAgless** Thu 14 Sep - 10:26

People who think we have actually been to the moon.

by Beer Thu 14 Sep - 10:34

rick_dagless wrote:People who think we have actually been to the moon.

This.

If we went there, why would we not go back!?

by **rIck_dAgless** Thu 14 Sep - 10:36

Beer wrote:
rick_dagless wrote:People who think we have actually been to the moon.

This.

If we went there, why would we not go back!?

Exactly

by Scottrf Thu 14 Sep - 10:40

Beer wrote:
rick_dagless wrote:People who think we have actually been to the moon.

This.

If we went there, why would we not go back!?

Not exactly value for money as a holiday destination?

by LionsV2 Thu 14 Sep - 10:42

Beer wrote:
Hero wrote:Flat Earthers.

It's 2017.

What about people who think Jet Fuel can melt steel beams????

People who don't realise that steel fails long before it melts.

by Beer Thu 14 Sep - 10:45

Scottrf wrote:
Beer wrote:
rick_dagless wrote:People who think we have actually been to the moon.

This.

If we went there, why would we not go back!?
Not exactly value for money as a holiday destination?

Pretty sure it could be used for actual Spacey type things. Maybe put a satellite on there. Just thinking out of the box.

by Beer Thu 14 Sep - 10:46

LionsV2 wrote:
Beer wrote:
Hero wrote:Flat Earthers.

It's 2017.

What about people who think Jet Fuel can melt steel beams????

People who don't realise that steel fails long before it melts.

I was being flippant.

by TRUSSMAN66 Thu 14 Sep - 14:00

Anybody that rushes over to you and asks if you are alright when you fall over in the Street.....

No... The idea is for you to walk on and pretend you haven't seen me look a complete knob.

by **Pr4wn** Thu 14 Sep - 14:16

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Anybody that rushes over to you and asks if you are alright when you fall over in the Street.....

No... The idea is for you to walk on and pretend you haven't seen me look a complete knob.

Or people that tell you to be careful just after you've fallen over or walked into something.

by Scottrf Thu 14 Sep - 14:17

Pedestrians. People take up the whole pavement even if they can see me running from hundreds of metres away.

by lfc91 Thu 14 Sep - 14:19

Runners in my local park who are out together and feel the need to run five abreast so they can all chat.

by **Galted** Thu 14 Sep - 16:06

Scottrf. When I take up the whole pavement as soon as I see him approaching from hundreds of metres away and he runs into the street to get around me.

by **Dolphin Ziggler** Thu 14 Sep - 16:39

Beer wrote:
Scottrf wrote:
Beer wrote:
rick_dagless wrote:People who think we have actually been to the moon.

This.

If we went there, why would we not go back!?
Not exactly value for money as a holiday destination?

Pretty sure it could be used for actual Spacey type things. Maybe put a satellite on there. Just thinking out of the box.

He's not committing to another project till they finish House of Cards.

by **navyblueshorts** Fri 15 Sep - 7:35

Pr4wn wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Anybody that rushes over to you and asks if you are alright when you fall over in the Street.....

No... The idea is for you to walk on and pretend you haven't seen me look a complete knob.

Or people that tell you to be careful just after you've fallen over or walked into something.

People who dare to suggest it's lucky if you've just been shat on by a pigeon/seagull...

Mid-40something cyclists riding 2/3/4 abreast on busy roads and who get annoyed if anyone dares to think they can overtake them in a car.
**** off! You aren't in the Tour de France and motor vehicles haven't been barred from your path or your vicinity.

by **Hero** Fri 15 Sep - 11:17

navyblueshorts wrote:
Pr4wn wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Anybody that rushes over to you and asks if you are alright when you fall over in the Street.....

No... The idea is for you to walk on and pretend you haven't seen me look a complete knob.

Or people that tell you to be careful just after you've fallen over or walked into something.
People who dare to suggest it's lucky if you've just been shat on by a pigeon/seagull...

Mid-40something cyclists riding 2/3/4 abreast on busy roads and who get annoyed if anyone dares to think they can overtake them in a car.
**** off! You aren't in the Tour de France and motor vehicles haven't been barred from your path or your vicinity.

Add to that people riding horses on roads.
Oh slow down, the horse gets scared of cars. Well why take it to the place where it's most likely to meet one.

by TRUSSMAN66 Fri 15 Sep - 11:58

The guy in the next Hotel room slamming his wife for about 3 hours every night of the holiday and you just know that your wife is listening to it thinking and look what I get !! Who gets on your wick.... - Page 9 3559488474

Who gets on your wick.... - Page 9 3559488474

by Scottrf Fri 15 Sep - 12:11

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:The guy in the next Hotel room slamming his wife for about 3 hours every night of the holiday and you just know that your wife is listening to it thinking and look what I get !!

So be a real man.

by mikey_dragon Tue 19 Sep - 9:29

Floyd 'money' Mayweather. Just put your few grand away Floyd and take your kids to school by yourself for a change.

by Steffan Tue 19 Sep - 13:32

Scottrf wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:The guy in the next Hotel room slamming his wife for about 3 hours every night of the holiday and you just know that your wife is listening to it thinking and look what I get !!

So be a real man.

She sits up every night wishing she had a real man. Tell her to bring her pretty little self to my caravan tonight (actually not tonight as I am off work with the flu)...and I will show her a real man

by **navyblueshorts** Wed 7 Feb - 11:28

...and Trudeau was doing so well:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-42970468/trudeau-peoplekind-not-mankind

Berk.

by Scottrf Wed 7 Feb - 11:35

I'm sure if he said mankind, someone else would take offense.

by **rIck_dAgless** Wed 7 Feb - 13:53

Anyone who sends passive aggressive work emails with emoji's on them Smile

by **Galted** Wed 7 Feb - 16:11

rick_dagless wrote:Anyone who sends passive aggressive work emails with emoji's on them

Anyone who sends work emails with a line of 15-20 question marks or exclamation marks after each point.

by **navyblueshorts** Wed 7 Feb - 16:30

Scottrf wrote:I'm sure if he said mankind, someone else would take offense.

Probably true, especially in 2018. That said, our species is known as 'man'. I suppose we could always use 'homo sapiens'...drat, we can't as 'homo' means 'man'. What a quandary....

by **rIck_dAgless** Thu 8 Feb - 7:29

Galted wrote:
rick_dagless wrote:Anyone who sends passive aggressive work emails with emoji's on them

Anyone who sends work emails with a line of 15-20 question marks or exclamation marks after each point.

Anyone who sends work emails asking if I am well...

by SecretFly Thu 8 Feb - 11:36

navyblueshorts wrote:...and Trudeau was doing so well:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-42970468/trudeau-peoplekind-not-mankind

Berk.

Trudeau was always a berk. He just needed to provide more evidence for more of his fans to get the message. I'm glad he's provided it. Gender Neutral, Species Neutral, Toilet Neutral. - Yep, you correct all the world's practical ills by constantly playing the derigueur Man=Evil card.

by **Pr4wn** Thu 8 Feb - 13:50

Not sure he's ever said that, but hey. Still far more popular domestically and internationally then Theresa May.

That said, he's definitely somewhat of a sycophant, though I do genuinely believe his heart is in the right place. Also, a vast improvement over Harper.

by **rIck_dAgless** Tue 6 Mar - 13:04

People who use uppercase to highlight points in a discussion, rather than improving the way they are debating a point.

FACT.

by **Pr4wn** Tue 6 Mar - 14:24

I hear that's Presidential behaviour.

by Sponsored content