What am I referring to?

Hello



At one point we were approximately 3000 ahead of them.

However, last week they overtook us for the first time.

Thankfully this week we have surpassed them again.

They are currently on around 40 thousand and 8 hundred.

We are on 41 thousand and 400. All numbers are approximations and liable to change very quickly.

What and who am I talking about?



emancipator - analyser and statistician

Posts on Murray versus posts on Federer. Calder and CC have worked very hard to overcome the number of posts on the latter.

Tennis over cricket......

That was easy Emancipator!

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh

Teneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez

Nooooooooooooo

You've ruined my fun

There are more cricket members than tennis, so well done.

Tenez wrote:Posts on Murray versus posts on Federer. Calder and CC have worked very hard to overcome the number of posts on the latter.

Youv'e got it wrong Tenez. The person who posts most on Murray is Hawkeye. I try counter balance their argument by giving the alternative point of view. That's what debating is about.

Really? There is section to write about these things? http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ2MKKS97a-eYzwPaIEbajuEC_If1_8uQ7M1j-llyO-Hjz25uSw

Sounds fishy.

Calder106 wrote:

Tenez wrote:Posts on Murray versus posts on Federer. Calder and CC have worked very hard to overcome the number of posts on the latter.

Youv'e got it wrong Tenez. The person who posts most on Murray is Hawkeye. I try counter balance their argument by giving the alternative point of view. That's what debating is about.

Wasn't a critique. Just a bit of humour. However the Murray fans out-number largely the anti-Murrays and more so in the number of posts they drop on the subject...from the little I read anyway.

Np Tenez. I realised it was a bit tongue in cheek.